Data Use Model
I'm posting this in order to have a source to go to if someone could use it later on.
After I posted the information about this rerpot to my libraries, I also distributed Marianne Kotch's Communicating the Importance of Data Collection- Selected Resources, that she compiled and distributed during her recent presentation. I got a big thank you from one of the library directors, saying that that's exactly what she was looking for.
Thursday, January 18, 2007
Questions raised about "Other Electronic Information" data elements
Questions about “Number of Internet Computers Used by General Public” (#650) and “Number of Users of Public Internet Computers Per Year” (#651)
#650: At least one SDC received a question from a librarian about whether to include laptops patrons bring into the library, and used to access the Internet. Perhaps the addition of the word “public” in front of the word “Internet” would clarify this.
#651: For the Note – Could we include the same description of annualizing a weekly count as is used in other annual counts? (#501 and #502) This would be consistent.
I'm posting this for the purposes of getting comments -- this is not a proposal!
1 Comments:
- At 5:20 PM, Frank Nelson said...
-
Kit,
I think we tried to head of the personal laptop confusion by adding "library's" before the word Internet in the 2006 edition of the WebPLUS User's Guide. Specifically the definition for 650 currently reads:
"Report the number of the library's Internet computers. . ."
Doesn't that accomplish what we want here?
As for including the same description of annualizing a weekly count as is used in other annual counts such as in 501 and 502, by all means, I think we should.
1/22/07
___________________________
Monday, January 22, 2007
Test
1/22/2007This is a test to see if I can post to this blog.
Juan - Utah SDC
Thursday, February 08, 2007
Managing survey dissemination
We FSCSers are being requested constantly to get libraries to complete surveys other than our public library reports. I opine this dilutes my effectiveness to impress upon the libraries the importance of the FSCS report. The FSCS report becomes one of many that they hear me asking that the library complete. My ideal solution would be to merge these other surveys into the FSCS survey. However, this is impractical because of the three year process we have for vetting new data elements. Instead, I suggest that those of use who use Bibliostat Collect incorporate these various survey data elements into our FSCS data collection effort via Bibliostat Collect. We render onto FSCS the data that are FSCS’s and unto the others the data that are for the others.
This data collection would not be universal because of the states that do not use Bibliostat Collect. However, enough of us do use Bibliostat Collect so that the data would provide a sufficient national sampling, which is what all these other surveys aim for. The benefit to us Bibliostat Collect licensees is that the numbers we collect for our respective states provide a state universal collection that we can use against the national compilation. As it stands now, the return rate from Minnesota is so small that I cannot use the data on a state basis, even if it is sufficient for the national survey. I suspect this is true for most of us.
To achieve this compilation via Bibliostat Collect, we need an ad hoc committee that decides which surveys merit inclusion. I propose that the committee comprise Denise Davis and the chair and vice chairs of the FSCS steering committee and the COSLA research and statistics committee.
posted by Kit Keller - Nebraska @ 2/08/2007 11:13:00 AM 1 comments
1 Comments:
- At 11:15 AM, Kit Keller said...
-
This is a discussion item on the agenda of the FSCS Steering Committee's March meeting. The outcome of the discussion will be posted to this blog.
_________________________
Tuesday, February 20, 2007
Candidate information - FSCS Steering Committee
I have been asked to run for an empty spot on the FSCS steering committee and am delighted to agree to do so.
I have been the state data coordinator for Massachusetts since 1992 and have seen much change and progress over the years. I served on the steering committee for 3 years and was chair during 1999. I am deeply committed to the national data collection project and the FSCS process. I believe that the success that FSCS has seen over the years is due to the inclusive process of data collection and the commitment to consistent reporting and the quality of the data. Having said this, there is still, and always will be work to do. My main goal, if I am elected to serve on the steering committee, is to help usher the FSCS group through the upcoming years of change. My particular interests are accurate and clear data definitions, use of FSCS data by states, and the maintenance of the FSCS data collection project.
posted by Kit Keller - Nebraska @ 2/20/2007 12:19:00 PM 0 commentsWednesday, February 28, 2007
Take the Survey! Help plan the 2007 Conference
http://www.surveymonkey.com/s.asp?u=904873367946
Thursday, March 01, 2007
Proposed Changes [Downloadables]
Please comment on the proposed changes by March 19, 2007 if possible. [Deletions are in red] Additions are in blue. FN
Proposed Changes to FSCS Definitions for Audios [452] and Videos [453]--2007
Change the definitions of Audios and Videos to capture web-based audio-visual resources [downloadables and/or electronic units].
Rationale
Downloaded audios and videos should be counted in the totals regardless of whether or not the subtotals for this specialized delivery method are reported separately. By adding terms such as “electronic units,” downloads,” and “web-based” to the definitions for both Audios (452) and Videos (453), new electronic formats can be included in the totals for these types of materials.
These changes do not require new data elements. No new elements were created for tapes, CDs, DVDs etc. in part because of a general agreement that while the delivery method may change, the essential format itself remains the same, i.e., one still listens to audio, views video, or reads text. Whether something comes on a CD or tape (physical unit) or as a web-based “electronic unit” and is downloaded to the computer is irrelevant. One still needs a device to play the tune, listen to the audiobook, see the movie, or in the case of e-books, read the text.
It has never been deemed necessary to collect circulation data by type of material at the national level. Many if not all libraries that offer access to downloadable audios and videos are including usage data in their annual circulation. While it would be nice to see the impact of new formats on usage patterns, this level of detail is really beyond the scope of FSCS.
Also, while the language is not so specific as to include the term “electronic unit” the NISO definition (see Box 1) would appear to already allow the inclusion of units that don’t fit the “physical unit” mold.
Count Methodology
Count titles (or number of copies) available to library users that are accessible through the library’s online catalog (OPAC) and add to the totals for audio or video as appropriate.
States with ExperienceIdaho and Wisconsin added “electronic unit” term to definitions for audio and video in 2006.
Box 1. 4.2 Audio-Visual Materials (from NISO Z39.7 Data Dictionary)Materials that are displayed by visual projection or magnification, or through sound reproduction, or both, including sound recordings, motion pictures and video recordings, and graphic materials. Also included in this category are special visual materials such as three-dimensional artifacts and realia, and web-based audio-visual resources. Document in which sound and/or pictures are prominent, and which requires the use of special equipment to be seen and/or heard [ISO 5127-11]. Note 1: This includes audio documents such as records, tapes, cassettes, audio compact discs, files of digital audio recordings; visual documents such as slides, transparencies, and combined audio-visual documents such as motion pictures, video recordings, etc. Microforms are excluded.
Proposed Definition Edits
452 Audio - These are materials on which sounds (only) are stored (recorded) and that can be reproduced (played back) mechanically, electronically, or both. Include records, audiocassettes, audio cartridges, audio discs (including audio-CD-ROMs), audio-reels, talking books, and other sound recordings, such as web-based or downloaded audiobooks and MP3 files.
Report the number of physical units, both physical and electronic, including duplicates. [Delete: For smaller libraries, if physical unit data are not available, count the number of titles.] Items packaged together as a unit (e.g., two audiocassettes for one recorded book) and checked out as a unit are counted as one physical unit. For electronic units, report only items the library has selected as part of the collection and made accessible through the library’s Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC).
453 Video - These are materials on which moving pictures are recorded, with or without sound. Electronic playback reproduces pictures, with or without sound, using a television receiver or monitor. Video formats may include tape, DVD, CD-ROM, web-based or downloaded files, etc.
Report the number of [delete:physical] units, both physical and electronic, including duplicates. [delete:For smaller libraries, if physical unit data are not available, count the number of titles.] Items packaged together as a unit (e.g., two video cassettes for one movie) and checked out as a unit are counted as one physical unit. For electronic units, report only items the library has selected as part of the collection and made accessible through the library’s Online Public Access Catalog (OPAC).
The [electronic unit] methodology will need to be made very clear. As noted, many libraries offering this service do so as part of a cooperative consortia, so all titles are available in the catalog of each library. So does the methodology suggest that a combined electronic unit count of 3000 titles would be reported 47 times by all 47 members of a consortia?
Also, someone may point out that MARC records for titles that libraries make available via Overdrive is an optional, fee-based service from Overdrive. Many Overdrive sites may have opted to present access via their Overdrive interface alone, and did not pay extra to drop MARC records into their regular catalog. So under this methodology, would those sites get to count those titles or not?
______
Also worth a thought that there ARE libraries that have not adopted an OPAC, yet participate in downloadable audio circ - should the ability to count be skewed by the method one uses to keep track of circulation?
______
It would help to have more information about Overdrive.
Looking at their site, it looks as though audiobooks are listed by title. Does it not make more sense to count the total number of items (copies) to which the library subscribes?
I am not clear on checkout procedures. I see that an audiobook can be downloaded a chapter at a time, but is that after the entire book has been checked out? It would be a problem to count each downloaded chapter as a circulation, IMHO. I don't have a problem counting each unit (audiobook) as a circulation.
2 Comments:
- At 11:02 AM, said...
-
The FSCS definitions have clearly distinguished between books and serials and e-books and e-serials. They also distinguish between expenditures for e-materials and other materials. Therefore it seems to me that there should be a distinction between audios and e-audios and videos and e-videos. There are some radical distinctions between a physical unit and an electronic title. In many cases with e-titles there is no count of the number of copies. There is also no need to visit the library to borrow an e-title.
Matt Kane
PA SDC
- At 2:53 PM, Marianne said...
-
Good grief! I would encourage a decrease in the number of data elements rather than adding another "e" distinction in format to two more data elements.
_________________________
Thursday, April 12, 2007
By-laws Correction
At the March 2007 Steering Committee meeting, it was decided to replace this line in the by-laws since it was determined that the deletion was a typographical error.
Monday, April 23, 2007
"An Hour in the Life of" bookmark available on NCLIS website
"An Hour in the Life of"' bookmark; Prepared by Shelley Fugitt (SDC, Tennessee); September 2006 ; (bookmark measurements: width 2.5"; height 7.5")pdf (place viewer setting at 100% for actual size): http://www.nclis.gov/statsurv/surveys/fscs/SDCmain/SDCresources/Library_Bookmark.pdfKim MillerUS NCLISTuesday, May 01, 2007
Candidate information - Edythe Huffman, SDC Indiana
I have worked in academic, public, school and special libraries in 6 states, including 2 state library agencies. I have also worked as an SDC in Minnesota (2+ years) and Indiana (7 years), so I have seen some of the annual report issues played out in various communities. I'm interested in the psychological and economic development aspects of statistics and in how group dynamics affect the national collection, scrutiny and analysis of of public library data. I would promise to be open minded about collecting new data, writing new definitions and looking at what data we can discontinue collecting, because I know first-hand the burden this report is in Indiana (we collect a lot of data!) I will do the best job I can and advocate for any point of view which I can be convinced is valid (I, do, after all, have two hands!)
Labels: Candidate information - FSCS Steering Committee
Monday, June 25, 2007
Williamsport PA Hits Home Run with Library Stats
Nice local article showing use of public library statistics:
http://www.sungazette.com/news/articles.asp?articleID=19398
Will post similar articles from time to time if you all are interested,
Cheers,
Ira
_________________________
Thursday, July 05, 2007
Annual Professional Development Conference Update
The annual Professional Development Conference for State Data Coordinators is suspended for 2007, in light of the transition of the Public Library Statistics program from the National Center for Education Statistics to the Institute of Museum and Library Services (IMLS).
IMLS is committed to continuing the annual professional development conferences for SDCs, with the first full conference planned for 2008. The Data Conference Subcommittee is proceeding with plans for that event. In 2007, IMLS will sponsor a training workshop for new State Data Coordinators.
The training workshop will be held during the first week of December. More details will be available as plans are finalized.
Please contact your Mentor with any questions or concerned. We will provide additional information as it becomes available!
posted by Kit Keller - Nebraska @ 7/05/2007 08:51:00 AM 2 comments
2 Comments:
- At 12:22 PM, Dr. Curtis Rogers said...
-
It's interesting that IMLS will provide training for new SDC's, however, will those of us who have been doing this for a few or more years be missing out on anything new they'll be discussing from the IMLS point of view? I think it would be a good idea to see an agenda of items they'll plan to cover so that everyone can see what the newbies will be being told :-) (Actually, I still consider myself a newbie because I'm only on my 2nd year of gathering data from public and academic libraries).
- At 12:59 PM, Kit Keller - Nebraska said...
-
Curtis,
Excellent idea! I will be attending the training this year for new SDCs and I will definitely blog the agenda, notes, etc. In fact, as soon as we have an agenda I'll post it to the blog.
_________________________
Thursday, July 05, 2007
Audio/Video Definition Update
As a result SDCs need to do one of the following:
a) If the form has not yet been changed--leave it as is, but consider introducing downloadable audio and video as separate items to get libraries started thinking about it;
b) If the forms are already designed to separate out the downloadable items so you can introduce concepts, collect data on downloadable audio and video but exclude it from the next federal submission.
c) If downloadable audio and video counts have already been collected as part of the existing audio and video elements and cannot be separated, go ahead and use the data at the state level, but report -1s for both audio and video for the federal submission.
Use the manual received in December for the definition that is still in effect.
If you have questions please contact your Mentor.
-
Thursday, July 12, 2007
Steering Committee Election Update
-
- At 11:20 AM, Suzanne said...
-
Thank you, Kit and Frank, for being willing to take on another year on the steering committee.
-
Tuesday, September 04, 2007
Steering Committee Update
Monday, September 10, 2007
September meeting of FSCS Steering Committee
In the meantime, send questions or comments to Steering Committee members, or post them to the blog.
-
Tuesday, October 02, 2007
Under New Management!
Plans are underway for this year's training workshop for new State Data Coordinators, as well as for the full conference to be held in December 2008. Members of the Steering Committee will keep you informed as news becomes available, and we will update the blog as well. Feel free to post comments on the blog, or send questions to your mentor or to the Steering Committee.
Labels: conference, IMLS, new SDCs, transition
-
Thursday, November 08, 2007
New SDC Training Workshop
Thursday, November 08, 2007
FSCS Steering Committee Update
The Steering Committee will meet in Washington for the next quarterly meeting, scheduled for Dec. 4-6. Check this site for news of the transition, plans for the 2008 Professional Development Conference, and other anticipated updates.As always, contact your Steering Committee mentor with any concerns you would like addressed/discussed at this meeting.
Thursday, December 20, 2007
PLSC Steering Committee Candidate 2008
Position on Statistical Data Collection:
Be sure, very sure, that the data requested is needed and, if passing that test, use the data to make services and programs better so as to better serve the user.
Presently:
Oversee: State Aid funding, statewide Consultant Services, Reference/Research Services, Technical Services, Statistics, Blind and Physically Handicapped Services, Legal/Legislative Programs. Manage staff of 39.
Job History:
1972 - Intern, Atomic Energy Commission, Oak Ridge, Tennessee; 1973-1975 - Reference Librarian, Marshall University, Huntingdon, West Virginia; 1975 -1979 - Division Chief of Non-Print Materials & Services, Public Library of Nashville, Nashville, Tennessee; !979-Present - Alabama Public Library Service, State Library of Alabama, Montgomery, Alabama.
Education:
BA - Lipscomb University (History & Business); MS - University of Tennessee (Library Science); JD - Jones School of Law at Faulkner University (Law).
-
-
Comments (0)
You don't have permission to comment on this page.