| 
  • If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

  • You already know Dokkio is an AI-powered assistant to organize & manage your digital files & messages. Very soon, Dokkio will support Outlook as well as One Drive. Check it out today!

View
 

163 Web Address

Page history last edited by Kim Miller 11 years, 7 months ago

This item deleted beginning FY2012 

 

163 Web Address

 

This is the Web address of the administrative entity.

 

http://_________________________________________

 

Note: If the Administrative Entity has no web address, enter “–3”

(for Not Applicable).

Comments (5)

Anonymous said

at 5:32 am on Jun 21, 2008

Import into WebPLUS should not include the http:// text.

Edythe Huffman said

at 1:59 am on Nov 19, 2011

I suggest the definition should be adjusted, so that a login not be required to access the library's web page as in Facebook. Many older and blind or visually impaired people have trouble using Facebook, so if that is the library's sole presence, it is not as user-friendly as a traditional web site.

Michael Golrick said

at 2:51 am on Nov 19, 2011

Edie-

You have conflated two issues. First is the issue of whether or not Facebook only constitutes a web presence, which is a discussion on our list at the moment. The other issue is whether or not the web presence meets accessibility requirements. Now, I believe (but do not know for sure) that Facebook does meet at least some of the requirements since I have at least one Facbook "friend" who is blind. In fact, I would argue that we should include the accessibility issue in the definition, but not mention any particular web-based service.

patience.frederiksen@... said

at 4:23 am on Nov 22, 2011

I am thinking that maybe we should revise this to WEB PRESENCE and allow for web pages, facebook, blogs, and who knows-maybe even twitter or library smartphone apps. The main issue here for me is whether the library is trying to make itself felt online by broadcasting info about itself to people. I do not include e-mail in this list, since I consider that one to one communication. Twitter is also one to one, but it goes to many if you have many followers. Comments?

Edythe Huffman said

at 5:25 am on Nov 22, 2011

Web presence sounds good, but we would still want to collect address. Maybe a list for them to check, so we can standardize it?

You don't have permission to comment on this page.